Read v. Mills

New York Supreme Court

Read v. Mills

31 N.Y.S. 1132, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879

DecidedDecember 10, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1132 (Read v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Read v. Mills, 31 N.Y.S. 1132, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an action to recover for the services and disbursements of a lawyer who is now dead. The cause was tried before a referee, who has made a report in favor of the plaintiff, upon which a judgment has been entered. The defendant has appealed from the judgment. Without exception, the case involved questions of fact only, and the referee has made a'very careful examination of the testimony. We are satisfied with his conclusions both upon the point of law raised and the questions, of fact presented. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DYKMAN, J.

This is an action to recover for the services and disbursements of a lawyer who is now dead. The cause was tried before a referee, who has made a report in favor of the plaintiff, upon which a judgment has been entered. The defendant has appealed from the judgment. Without exception, the case involved questions of fact only, and the referee has made a'very careful examination of the testimony. We are satisfied with his conclusions both upon the point of law raised and the questions, of fact presented. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 N.Y.S. 1132, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-mills-nysupct-1894.