Read v. Lloyds America

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Read v. Lloyds America

1937 OK 595, 72 P.2d 502, 181 Okla. 92, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 49

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 19, 1937

DocketNo. 27302.

StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK 595 (Read v. Lloyds America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Read v. Lloyds America, 1937 OK 595, 72 P.2d 502, 181 Okla. 92, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 49 (Okla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an application on behalf of the defendant in error for a writ of mandamus to require the State Insurance Commissioner to issue a permit to do business as an automobile concern in this state. The district court issued a writ in mandamus and refused to stay execution upon application of the State Insurance Commissioner, and thereupon the State Insurance Commissioner appealed and applied to this court for such stay, which was on July 13, 1936, *93 denied. On July 14, 1937, the defendant in error filed its motion to dismiss alleging in substance that House Bill 304, c. 51, art. 6, of the Session Laws 1937, has become effective and defendant in error is now licensed. On July 27, 1937, this court called for a response by the plaintiff in error, but none has been filed. No excuse is offered for such failure, and this court will consider the motion confessed.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, O. J., and PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. BAT-LESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was an application on behalf of the defendant in error for a writ of mandamus to require the State Insurance Commissioner to issue a permit to do business as an automobile concern in this state. The district court issued a writ in mandamus and refused to stay execution upon application of the State Insurance Commissioner, and thereupon the State Insurance Commissioner appealed and applied to this court for such stay, which was on July 13, 1936, *93 denied. On July 14, 1937, the defendant in error filed its motion to dismiss alleging in substance that House Bill 304, c. 51, art. 6, of the Session Laws 1937, has become effective and defendant in error is now licensed. On July 27, 1937, this court called for a response by the plaintiff in error, but none has been filed. No excuse is offered for such failure, and this court will consider the motion confessed.

The appeal is dismissed.

OSBORN, O. J., and PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. BAT-LESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, and DAVISON, JJ., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1937 OK 595, 72 P.2d 502, 181 Okla. 92, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-lloyds-america-okla-1937.