Read v. Hobart
69 N.Y.S. 1144
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 1901
StatusPublished
This text of 69 N.Y.S. 1144 (Read v. Hobart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Read v. Hobart, 69 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that nothing is presented for our review by the appellant’s exceptions; also, held, that the motion, made by the appellants upon the argument of the appeal, for leave to file exception to referee’s report nunc pro tunc, be denied. All concúr, except SPRING, J., who concurs for affirmance on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
69 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-hobart-nyappdiv-1901.