Read v. Hall

57 N.H. 482, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 118
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedAugust 11, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 57 N.H. 482 (Read v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Read v. Hall, 57 N.H. 482, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 118 (N.H. 1876).

Opinion

Smith, J.

The defendant is estopped to deny that she had a check for $100. The contract, then, was a contract in respect to that $100; and, according to Hammond v. Corbett, 51 N. H. 311, she is liable. In view of recent legislation (ch. 32, Acts of 1876 — 2 Sess. Laws 580), we do not feel called upon to overrule that case, or to question the soundness of that decision. The court probably went to the extreme verge in that case, in the construction of the statute of 1867 (Gen. Stats., ch. 164, sec. 13), of which it was capable.

Gushing, O. J., and Ladd, J., concurred.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 N.H. 482, 1876 N.H. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-hall-nh-1876.