Read v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Read v. City of New York

263 A.D.2d 535, 692 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 26, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D.2d 535 (Read v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Read v. City of New York, 263 A.D.2d 535, 692 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from operating a certain homeless shelter, and to compel compliance with certain rules and regulations, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), dated June 4, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court dated- February 24, 1998, granting the respective motions of the defendants City of New York, Department of Homeless Services, and Human Resources Administration, and the Church Avenue Merchant Block Association, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) as time-barred, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ action as time-barred (see, CPLR 217, 7801, 7803). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from operating a certain homeless shelter, and to compel compliance with certain rules and regulations, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), dated June 4, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court dated- February 24, 1998, granting the respective motions of the defendants City of New York, Department of Homeless Services, and Human Resources Administration, and the Church Avenue Merchant Block Association, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) as time-barred, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ action as time-barred (see, CPLR 217, 7801, 7803). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D.2d 535, 692 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/read-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.