Rea v. State

118 S.E. 75, 30 Ga. App. 373, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 475
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1923·No. 14558·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

“ While the evidence is rather weak, this court cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court a reviewing court' is powerless to interfere.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82, 83 (105 S. E. 377), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rea v. State, 118 S.E. 75, 30 Ga. App. 373, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 475 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

118 S.E. 75 (Rea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsend v. State
105 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)