Rea v. Horton
This text of 241 A.D. 742 (Rea v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order as resettled reversed on the law and motion domed, without costs and without prejudice to a new application when the case is properly on the calendar. The court was without authority to grant a preference until the case was properly on the calendar. (Zimmerman v. Rahmeyer, 230 App. Div. 719.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rea-v-horton-nyappdiv-1934.