Rea v. Horton
241 A.D. 742
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order as resettled reversed on the law and motion domed, without costs and without prejudice to a new application when the case is properly on the calendar. The court was without authority to grant a preference until the case was properly on the calendar. (Zimmerman v. Rahmeyer, 230 App. Div. 719.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rea v. Horton, 241 A.D. 742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 742 (Rea v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vinal v. New York Central Railroad
48 Misc. 2d 362 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
A. Kreamer, Inc. v. M. Kamenstein, Inc.
251 A.D. 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)