Rea v. Bell
23 A. 349, 147 Pa. 118, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 793
Opinion
We are of the opinion that John Rea, the plaintiff, took an estate in fee-simple to the real estate in controversy, under the will of his father, Henry Rea, Sr. The devise is to John Rea, “his heirs and assigns, forever.” The fee thus given is not cut down by what immediately follows. The greatest effect that can be given to the subsequent language of the will, is that it is in restraint of alienation, and, under all the authorities, void.
Judgment affirmed. C.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rea v. Bell, 23 A. 349, 147 Pa. 118, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 793 (Pa. 1892).
23 A. 349 (Rea v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
UNITED STATES v. 0.20 Acre of Land in New Alexandria Borough, Westmoreland County
71 F. Supp. 576 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)
Byrne's Estate
181 A. 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Everts v. Kepler
9 Pa. D. & C. 439 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Boulevard from Second Street
42 Pa. Super. 372 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)