Re v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2014
Docket14-1286
StatusUnpublished

This text of Re v. United States (Re v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Re v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KYLE RE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1286 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-03518- WHA, Judge William H. Alsup. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

S. CHANDLER VISHER, Law Offices of S. Chandler Visher, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff- appellant.

MICHAEL QUINN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN, Director, and RUTH A. HARVEY, Assistant Director and ALICIA M. HUNT, Trial Attorney. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Re v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-v-united-states-cafc-2014.