Re v. United States
This text of Re v. United States (Re v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KYLE RE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1286 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-03518- WHA, Judge William H. Alsup. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
S. CHANDLER VISHER, Law Offices of S. Chandler Visher, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
MICHAEL QUINN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litiga- tion Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN, Director, and RUTH A. HARVEY, Assistant Director and ALICIA M. HUNT, Trial Attorney. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Re v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-v-united-states-cafc-2014.