R.E. v. M.S.
This text of R.E. v. M.S. (R.E. v. M.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Brian Lee Ciyou Thomas L. Landwerlen Lori B. Schmeltzer Landwerlen & Rothkopf, LLP Ciyou & Dixon, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana
______________________________________________________________________________
In the Indiana Supreme Court Jan 06 2016, 1:29 pm
_________________________________
No. 49S05-1601-PO-6
R.E., Appellant (Respondent below),
v.
M.S., Appellee (Petitioner below).
Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, No. 49G21-1404-PO-010832 The Honorable Gary L. Miller, Judge _________________________________
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A05-1409-PO-445 _________________________________
January 6, 2016
Per Curiam.
R.E. appealed the trial court’s issuance of a protective order against her in favor of M.S. The Court of Appeals affirmed in a memorandum decision. Among other things, R.E. requested that the Court of Appeals redact her full name from its decision, and identify her by initials only. The Court of Appeals denied her requests. R.E. seeks transfer, which we now grant for the purpose of substituting R.E.’s name with her initials in our opinion. In all other respects we summarily affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision. See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A)(2).
All Justices concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R.E. v. M.S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-v-ms-ind-2016.