Re v. Diamond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Re v. Diamond

246 A.D. 776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 776 (Re v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Re v. Diamond, 246 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by striking therefrom the provision staying the appellant from further proceeding and enforcing the collection of a judgment obtained by him in the Municipal Court, and as so modified affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. The Municipal Court had jurisdiction of the parties and the issue in controversy and appellant is bound by the judgment. While respondent claims the note, which was the subject-matter of the Municipal Court action, was procured by fraud, he does not allege there was fraud in the means by which the judgment was procured, nor does he in this action attack the judgment or ask any relief with respect thereto. Therefore, it was error to stay the enforcement of the judgment. (Stilwell v. Carpenter, 59 N. Y. 414; Fuhrmann v. Fanroth, 254 id. 479.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking therefrom the provision staying the appellant from further proceeding and enforcing the collection of a judgment obtained by him in the Municipal Court, and as so modified affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. The Municipal Court had jurisdiction of the parties and the issue in controversy and appellant is bound by the judgment. While respondent claims the note, which was the subject-matter of the Municipal Court action, was procured by fraud, he does not allege there was fraud in the means by which the judgment was procured, nor does he in this action attack the judgment or ask any relief with respect thereto. Therefore, it was error to stay the enforcement of the judgment. (Stilwell v. Carpenter, 59 N. Y. 414; Fuhrmann v. Fanroth, 254 id. 479.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack