Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986

Tenth Circuit

Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986

955 F.2d 36, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3853, 1992 WL 26518

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1992

Docket36

StatusUnpublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 955 F.2d 36 (Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted November 18, 1986, 955 F.2d 36, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3853, 1992 WL 26518 (10th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, HOLLOWAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

On November 18,1986, the court adopted 10th Cir.R. 36.3 providing that “unpublished opinions and orders and judgments of this court have no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any other court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.” Circuit Judge Holloway (then Chief Judge) filed an unpublished dissent to that rule. Circuit Judges Barrett and Baldock joined in the dissent. The court is presently revising its rules. 10th Cir.R. 36.3 will not be revised, but will continue to include a reference to the dissent.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the dissent be published so that an appropriate citation thereto may appear in the revised rules.

DISSENT TO ADOPTION OF 10TH CIR.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, HOLLOWAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

On November 18,1986, the court adopted 10th Cir.R. 36.3 providing that “unpublished opinions and orders and judgments of this court have no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any other court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.” Circuit Judge Holloway (then Chief Judge) filed an unpublished dissent to that rule. Circuit Judges Barrett and Baldock joined in the dissent. The court is presently revising its rules. 10th Cir.R. 36.3 will not be revised, but will continue to include a reference to the dissent.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the dissent be published so that an appropriate citation thereto may appear in the revised rules.

DISSENT TO ADOPTION OF 10TH CIR.R. 36.3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

955 F.2d 36, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3853, 1992 WL 26518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-rules-of-the-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-tenth-circuit-ca10-1992.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack