Re Owens

38 S.W. 1116, 63 Ark. 403, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 119
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 30, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 38 S.W. 1116 (Re Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Re Owens, 38 S.W. 1116, 63 Ark. 403, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 119 (Ark. 1897).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The court had •no jurisdiction of the subject-matter. The proceedings in the court below could neither be styled a civil action nor a special proceeding. Sand. & H. Dig., secs, 5602, 5603. No one had brought suit or instituted proceedings to annul the contract entered into between J. H. Hicks -and appellant. The court was without power to make the order upon its own motion. See Ex parte Cohen, 6 Cal. 318.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Cohen
6 Cal. 318 (California Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.W. 1116, 63 Ark. 403, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-owens-ark-1897.