Re: MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTIONS

720 S.E.2d 908, 396 S.C. 209, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 425
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 2, 2011
Docket2011-05-02-01
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 720 S.E.2d 908 (Re: MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTIONS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Re: MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTIONS, 720 S.E.2d 908, 396 S.C. 209, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 425 (S.C. 2011).

Opinion

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

On May 22, 2009, I issued an Administrative Order (Order No.2009-05-22-01) applicable to mortgage foreclosure actions subject to the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HMP”) instituted by the United States Treasury Department (“Treasury”). The program applied to residential loans owned, securitized or guaranteed by the Federal National *210 Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).

Subsequently, Treasury issued, by directive, additional guidance to servicers for adoption and implementation of the HMP for residential mortgage loans that are not owned, securitized or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. However, the HMP is only applicable to such loans if the lender or servicer has agreed to participate in the HMP. Not all lenders or servicers have so agreed.

Since imposition of my prior order, the number of foreclosure actions filed in this State have continued to increase. The trial courts having jurisdiction over such actions have reported to this Court difficulty in making final disposition of these actions as a result of failed or delayed loss mitigation efforts between lender-servicers and mortgagor-debtors. As a result, the number of unresolved foreclosure actions has increased, with a resulting burden on the resources of the Court before which the action is pending.

The courts have reported that these failures are the result of a breakdown of loss mitigation efforts that all parties find to be in their best interests, if possible. The trial courts report that such breakdowns are largely the result of difficulty in communication between lender-servicers and debtors, and the fact that foreclosure actions are proceeding to conclusion without regard to ongoing loss mitigation efforts by the parties.

I further take judicial notice of the actions of courts in other jurisdictions describing a similar breakdown in the efforts of parties to foreclosure actions to reach a resolution of defaults in payment of mortgage loans.

Therefore, based on the foregoing, and in order to insure that eligible homeowners and lender-servicers have been afforded the benefits of loan modification or other loss mitigation where possible, and to insure that the procedures for handling issues relating to such efforts are handled uniformly throughout the State, so that mortgage foreclosure actions are not unnecessarily dismissed, delayed or inappropriately concluded while loan modification or other loss mitigation efforts are being pursued, it is ordered as follows:

*211 A. Definitions:

For the purposes of this administrative order, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) “Mortgagor” shall include every owner, mortgagor, and debtor under the note and mortgage at issue.
(2) “Mortgagee” shall include the owner and holder of the note and mortgage, any party acting on behalf of the owner and holder of the note and mortgage for the purpose of receiving payments, dealing with the mortgagor, or administering the loan evidenced by the note and mortgage, and any party seeking foreclosure of the subject mortgage, or otherwise acting as the agent of the owner and holder of the note in connection with the loan or the foreclosure of the note and mortgage, except for the mortgagee’s attorney.
(3) “Owner-Occupied dwelling” is defined as mortgaged real property that is the principal residence of any mortgagor.
(4) “Court” shall include any judicial officer having jurisdiction over the foreclosure action, including any Circuit Court Judge, Master-In-Equity or Special Referee.
(5) “Foreclosure intervention” shall include any policy, process or procedure employed by a Mortgagee for the purpose of seeking a resolution of a foreclosure action by loan modification or other means of loss mitigation.

B. Procedure in Foreclosure Actions:

The terms and conditions of this order shall apply to all mortgage foreclosure proceedings concerning Owner-Occupied dwellings in this State.

(1) Actions pending on May 9, 2011.

In all mortgage foreclosure actions pending on May 9, 2011, before any merits hearing in the case, or if an order of foreclosure has been entered, before any foreclosure sale, the Mortgagee shall, through its attorney of record, file with the court and serve upon every Mortgagor a notice of the Mortgagor’s right to foreclosure intervention. All proceedings in the foreclosure action shall be stayed until completion of such foreclosure intervention.

*212 No foreclosure hearing or foreclosure sale may be held in the foreclosure action until the Mortgagee’s attorney certifies the following:

(a) that the Mortgagor has been served with a notice of the Mortgagor’s right to foreclosure intervention for the purpose of seeking a resolution of the foreclosure action by loan modification or other means of loss mitigation;
(b) that the Mortgagee, or its designated agent, has received and examined all documents and records required to be submitted by the Mortgagor to evaluate eligibility for foreclosure intervention;
(c) that the Mortgagor has been afforded a full and fair opportunity to submit any other information or data pertaining to the Mortgagor’s loan or personal circumstances for consideration by the Mortgagee;
(d) that after completion of the foreclosure intervention process, the Mortgagor does not qualify for loan modification or other means of loss mitigation, in accordance with any standards, rules or guidelines applicable to the mortgage loan, and the parties have been unable to reach any other agreement concerning the foreclosure process; and,
(e) that notice of the denial of loan modification or other means of loss mitigation has been served on the Mortgagor by mailing such notice to all known addresses of the Mortgagor; provided, that such notice shall also state that the Mortgagor has 30 days from the date of mailing of notice of denial of relief to file and serve an answer or other response to the Mortgagee’s summons and complaint.

If within thirty days after having been served with notice of the Mortgagor’s rights, the Mortgagor has failed, refused, or voluntarily elected not to participate in any foreclosure intervention process, the Mortgagee, through its attorney, shall certify that fact to the Court, and the foreclosure action may proceed.

(2) Actions filed after May 9, 2011.

In all mortgage foreclosure actions filed after May 9, 2011, the Mortgagee’s attorney shall serve on the Mortgagor, along with the summons and complaint, a notice of the Mortgagor’s right to foreclosure intervention.

*213

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Ditech Holding Corp.
Second Circuit, 2025
John Weible v. Russell Self
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2025
Ditech Holding Corporation
S.D. New York, 2023
Buffalo Creek investments, Inc. v. Stephen H. Pettus
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023
Ditech Financial, LLC v. Kevin Snyder
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 S.E.2d 908, 396 S.C. 209, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/re-mortgage-foreclosure-actions-sc-2011.