Re Fleuss

D.C. Circuit

Re Fleuss

41 App. D.C. 520, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1914

DocketNo. 901

StatusPublished

This text of 41 App. D.C. 520 (Re Fleuss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Re Fleuss, 41 App. D.C. 520, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2214 (D.C. Cir. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. (Miiei Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The conclusions of the Patent Office tribunals, we ibinlc, are sound. Among tbe authorities cited in their support in tbe brief for tbe Commissioner, see Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112, 119, 22 L. ed. 566, 567; Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U. S. 164, 170, 37 L. ed. 1039, 1041, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 68; Re Iwan, 17 App. D. C. 566, 571; Re Welch, 28 App. D. C. 362, 364.

Being fully satisfied with tbe decisions quoted, it is unnecessary to further discuss tbe question.

Tbe decision is affirmed. Tbe clerk will certify this decision to the Commissioner of Patents as the law requires.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI