Re Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger

Supreme Court of Alabama

Re Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger

768 So. 2d 975, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 135, 2000 WL 356330

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 7, 2000·No. 1981716·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as improvidently granted.

[976] In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, COOK, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. SEE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as improvidently granted.

[976] In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, COOK, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. SEE, J., dissents.

Re Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger, 768 So. 2d 975, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 135, 2000 WL 356330 (Ala. 2000).

Pincite

768 So. 2d 975 (Re Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related