R.E. 2000, Inc. v. Crown Laundries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.E. 2000, Inc. v. Crown Laundries, Inc.

755 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4254, 2000 WL 368579

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the amended final summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Crown Laundries, Inc. The record before us demonstrates that genuine issues remain unresolved concerning virtually all the material facts surrounding the parties’ conduct and their rights and obligations, vel non, under the laundry lease including but not limited to notice and estoppel. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Rafkind v. Beer, 426 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In addition, R.E.2000, Inc., shall be permitted the opportunity to amend its pleadings to raise an unpled defense.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the amended final summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Crown Laundries, Inc. The record before us demonstrates that genuine issues remain unresolved concerning virtually all the material facts surrounding the parties’ conduct and their rights and obligations, vel non, under the laundry lease including but not limited to notice and estoppel. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Rafkind v. Beer, 426 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In addition, R.E.2000, Inc., shall be permitted the opportunity to amend its pleadings to raise an unpled defense.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

R.E. 2000, Inc. v. Crown Laundries, Inc., 755 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4254, 2000 WL 368579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

755 So. 2d 779 (R.E. 2000, Inc. v. Crown Laundries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related