R.D.N. v. A.M.N.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

R.D.N. v. A.M.N.

918 So. 2d 106, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 1532305

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.D.N. v. A.M.N.. Read the opinion of the Court — 912 So. 2d 1163 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2005·No. 2020447·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s February 20, 2004, af-firmance, without opinion, of the tidal court’s judgment, and it has remanded the case to this court with directions. Ex parte R.D.N., 918 So.2d 100 (Ala.2005). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court “for further proceedings consistent with [the Supreme Court’s] opinion.” 918 So.2d at 106.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s February 20, 2004, af-firmance, without opinion, of the tidal court’s judgment, and it has remanded the case to this court with directions. Ex parte R.D.N., 918 So.2d 100 (Ala.2005). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court “for further proceedings consistent with [the Supreme Court’s] opinion.” 918 So.2d at 106.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

R.D.N. v. A.M.N., 918 So. 2d 106, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 1532305 (Ala. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

918 So. 2d 106 (R.D.N. v. A.M.N.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related