R.D.N. v. A.M.N.

918 So. 2d 106, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 1532305
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 2005
Docket2020447
StatusPublished

This text of 918 So. 2d 106 (R.D.N. v. A.M.N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.D.N. v. A.M.N., 918 So. 2d 106, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 1532305 (Ala. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s February 20, 2004, af-firmance, without opinion, of the tidal court’s judgment, and it has remanded the case to this court with directions. Ex parte R.D.N., 918 So.2d 100 (Ala.2005). In compliance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court “for further proceedings consistent with [the Supreme Court’s] opinion.” 918 So.2d at 106.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.D.N. v. A.M.N.
918 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 So. 2d 106, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 1532305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rdn-v-amn-alacivapp-2005.