R.D.M. v. State

626 So. 2d 1088, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11677, 1993 WL 474007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1993·No. No. 93-451·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, a juvenile, was not present at the adjudicatory hearing at which he was adjudicated delinquent for carrying a concealed firearm. The state correctly concedes error, as juveniles have the right to be present at their adjudicatory hearings. M.C. v. State, 516 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.100(a). Although defense [1089]*1089counsel waived appellant’s presence at the hearing, such waiver was ineffective absent some ratification of the waiver on the part of the accused. See Savino v. State, 555 So.2d 1237, 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), rev’d on other grounds, 567 So.2d 892 (Fla.1990).

Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is reversed, and the case is remanded for a new adjudicatory hearing.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.D.M. v. State, 626 So. 2d 1088, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11677, 1993 WL 474007 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 1088 (R.D.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RR v. Portesy
629 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)