R.D.A. v. State
807 So. 2d 175, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1400, 2002 WL 216424
This text of 807 So. 2d 175 (R.D.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
R.D.A. v. State, 807 So. 2d 175, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1400, 2002 WL 216424 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
As the record reveals that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that R.D.A. committed trespass after warning, we reverse the judgment and sentence of guilt. See L.D.L. v. State, 569 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)(state has the burden [176]*176of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offense of trespass).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
L.D.L. v. State
569 So. 2d 1310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
807 So. 2d 175, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1400, 2002 WL 216424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rda-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.