R.D. v. State

742 So. 2d 255, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5000, 1997 WL 240913
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1997·No. No. 96-3408·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this case, a juvenile, was charged with aggravated battery and trespass in a conveyance. He pled guilty to the lesser included offense of battery and guilty as charged to the trespass charge. The Department of Juvenile Justice prepared a predisposition report recommending community control. However, at the disposition hearing, the trial court rejected this recommendation and instead imposed a high risk commitment. Because the court did so without first securing another recommendation from the Department as to restrictiveness level, its order violated the dictates of section 39.052(4)(e)2, Florida Statutes. We therefore vacate the disposition order and remand for further proceedings. S.R. v. State, 683 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); K.Y.L. and N.L. v. State, 685 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Vacated and remanded.

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.D. v. State, 742 So. 2d 255, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5000, 1997 WL 240913 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

742 So. 2d 255 (R.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. E.D.P.
724 So. 2d 1144 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
A.L.W. v. State
742 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
K.A.S. v. State
742 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)