Rcc Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Forrest Allen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 28, 2022
DocketA20A0547
StatusPublished

This text of Rcc Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Forrest Allen (Rcc Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Forrest Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rcc Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Forrest Allen, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

April 28, 2022

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A20A0547. RCC WESLEY CHAPEL CROSSING, LLC et al. v. ALLEN et al.

PHIPPS, Senior Appellate Judge.

This appeal arises from a grant of class certification. Forrest Allen brought an

action against RCC Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Little

Giant Farmers Market Corporation, River City Capital, LLC, and River City Capital

Property Management, LLC (collectively, the “Appellants”), for negligence, premises

liability, false imprisonment, conversion, and violation of the Georgia Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and he sought to have the action certified

on behalf of a proposed class of similarly situated persons. The trial court granted

Allen’s motion for class certification, and this Court affirmed that order. RCC Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Allen, 355 Ga. App. XXVII (Case No. A20A0547) (June 29,

2020) (unpublished) (“Allen I”).

In RCC Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Allen, 313 Ga. 69, 76-77 (3) (867

SE2d 108) (2021) (“Allen II”), the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated our opinion in

Allen I and directed this Court to remand the case to the trial court for reconsideration

of the proposed class certification consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Based on our review of Allen II, we conclude that the rulings in that decision

implicate only Division 1 (b) of our opinion in Allen I. Accordingly, we vacate

Division 1 (b) of our prior opinion in Allen I, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court

in Allen II with respect to that division, and remand the case to the trial court for

further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. Divisions 1 (a) &

(c), 2, and 3 of this Court’s opinion in Allen I were not affected by the Supreme

Court’s decision and thus remain binding on the parties to this action. See Shadix v.

Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563-564 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001).

Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part, and case remanded with

direction. Miller, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shadix v. Carroll County
554 S.E.2d 465 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
RCC WESLEY CHAPEL CROSSING, LLC v. ALLEN
867 S.E.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rcc Wesley Chapel Crossing, LLC v. Forrest Allen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rcc-wesley-chapel-crossing-llc-v-forrest-allen-gactapp-2022.