R.C. v. State

245 So. 3d 1001
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D17–1976
StatusPublished

This text of 245 So. 3d 1001 (R.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.C. v. State, 245 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*1002We reverse the adjudication of delinquency for two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia and remand for entry of a judgment of dismissal. The evidence presented at the adjudicatory hearing failed to establish that the residue on the alleged paraphernalia was a controlled substance. Therefore, the State failed to establish a prima facie case of use or possession with intent to use paraphernalia pursuant to section 893.147(1), Florida Statutes (2016), and the motion for judgment of dismissal should have been granted. See M.M. v. State, 152 So.3d 121, 123-24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

Reversed and remanded.

VILLANTI, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M.M. v. State
152 So. 3d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 So. 3d 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rc-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.