R.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.C. v. State

516 So. 2d 98, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1987 WL 2311

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1987·No. No. 85-1300·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.C. challenges the court’s order adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the crime of attempted sexual battery. First, he contends that the court erred in excluding relevant eyewitness testimony. Second, he argues that the state failed to present substantial, competent evidence to support the adjudication. Finding no merit in the points raised, we affirm. See Caulder v. State, 500 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review denied, 511 So.2d 297 (Fla.1987); R.A.S. v. State, 458 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.C. challenges the court’s order adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the crime of attempted sexual battery. First, he contends that the court erred in excluding relevant eyewitness testimony. Second, he argues that the state failed to present substantial, competent evidence to support the adjudication. Finding no merit in the points raised, we affirm. See Caulder v. State, 500 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review denied, 511 So.2d 297 (Fla.1987); R.A.S. v. State, 458 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

R.C. v. State, 516 So. 2d 98, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1987 WL 2311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

516 So. 2d 98 (R.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related