Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.C. v. State

R.C. v. State

516 So. 2d 98, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1987 WL 2311
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 1987
DocketNo. 85-1300
StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 98 (R.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.C. v. State, 516 So. 2d 98, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1987 WL 2311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.C. challenges the court’s order adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the crime of attempted sexual battery. First, he contends that the court erred in excluding relevant eyewitness testimony. Second, he argues that the state failed to present substantial, competent evidence to support the adjudication. Finding no merit in the points raised, we affirm. See Caulder v. State, 500 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review denied, 511 So.2d 297 (Fla.1987); R.A.S. v. State, 458 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); D.S.H. v. State, 323 So.2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caulder v. State
500 So. 2d 1362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
D. S. H. v. State
323 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
I.R. v. State
385 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
R.A.S. v. State
458 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 98, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2757, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1987 WL 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rc-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.