R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. v. Stan Musial & Biggie's, Inc.
Opinions
R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. requests a rehearing based on the contention that this court’s treatment of its claim for tortious interference with a business relationship, see 702 F.2d 907 (11th Cir.1983), is inconsistent with Florida law. In our earlier opinion we did not intend to imply that an enforceable contract between plaintiff and a third party is an essential element of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship. Hilton’s claim fails because he did [1172]*1172not establish the existence of an advantageous relationship with Stan Musial and Biggie’s, Inc.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
706 F.2d 1171 (R.C. Hilton Associates, Inc. v. Stan Musial & Biggie's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.