R.C. Dolner, Inc. v. My-Way Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

R.C. Dolner, Inc. v. My-Way Contracting Corp.

60 A.D.3d 545, 874 N.Y.S.2d 805

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 A.D.3d 545 (R.C. Dolner, Inc. v. My-Way Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.C. Dolner, Inc. v. My-Way Contracting Corp., 60 A.D.3d 545, 874 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 28, 2008, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendants Crum & Forster and U.S. Fire in the amount of $178,205.16, and denied those defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This Court previously affirmed the ruling that Crum & Forster and its subsidiary, U.S. Fire, were obligated, under plaintiff’s insurance policy, to provide coverage for damages incurred in connection with the renovation of a hotel (41 AD3d 185 [2007]). The amount of such damages is irrefutably established by evidence in the record. The award of prejudgment interest and the determination of the date from which computed were appropriate exercises of the court’s discretion (CELR 5001 [a]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 28, 2008, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendants Crum & Forster and U.S. Fire in the amount of $178,205.16, and denied those defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This Court previously affirmed the ruling that Crum & Forster and its subsidiary, U.S. Fire, were obligated, under plaintiff’s insurance policy, to provide coverage for damages incurred in connection with the renovation of a hotel (41 AD3d 185 [2007]). The amount of such damages is irrefutably established by evidence in the record. The award of prejudgment interest and the determination of the date from which computed were appropriate exercises of the court’s discretion (CELR 5001 [a]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 545, 874 N.Y.S.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rc-dolner-inc-v-my-way-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack