R.B.W. v. State

842 So. 2d 223, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4745, 2003 WL 1798256
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2390·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the state concedes, the juvenile disposition orders being appealed do not contain all of the information required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.115(c)(2). We affirm the appealed orders as to the findings that the appellant violated his probation and as to the disposition imposed in connection with those violations, but we remand the case for the entry of amended orders which conform with rule 8.115(c)(2).

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.B.W. v. State, 842 So. 2d 223, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4745, 2003 WL 1798256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

842 So. 2d 223 (R.B.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. State
842 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)