RBES, L.C. v. Santana

770 So. 2d 277, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2000 WL 1634404
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 2000
DocketNo. 3D00-2814
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 770 So. 2d 277 (RBES, L.C. v. Santana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RBES, L.C. v. Santana, 770 So. 2d 277, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2000 WL 1634404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Rodriguez-Betancourt & Elso, P.A., has filed this petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order dated September 7, 2000, granting a motion to inspect a computer belonging to petitioner, which is a non-party to the litigation. In his response, Armando C. Santana, respondent, asserts that this petition may be rendered moot as petitioner is being served with a subpoena duces tecum, the proper mechanism for obtaining discovery from non-parties. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351. We interpret this an admission that the petition is well-taken and grant the petition, quashing the order of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marrs v. State
770 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
770 So. 2d 277, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2000 WL 1634404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rbes-lc-v-santana-fladistctapp-2000.