RBES, L.C. v. Santana

District Court of Appeal of Florida

RBES, L.C. v. Santana

770 So. 2d 277, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2000 WL 1634404

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 2000·No. No. 3D00-2814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Rodriguez-Betancourt & Elso, P.A., has filed this petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order dated September 7, 2000, granting a motion to inspect a computer belonging to petitioner, which is a non-party to the litigation. In his response, Armando C. Santana, respondent, asserts that this petition may be rendered moot as petitioner is being served with a subpoena duces tecum, the proper mechanism for obtaining discovery from non-parties. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351. We interpret this an admission that the petition is well-taken and grant the petition, quashing the order of the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Rodriguez-Betancourt & Elso, P.A., has filed this petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order dated September 7, 2000, granting a motion to inspect a computer belonging to petitioner, which is a non-party to the litigation. In his response, Armando C. Santana, respondent, asserts that this petition may be rendered moot as petitioner is being served with a subpoena duces tecum, the proper mechanism for obtaining discovery from non-parties. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351. We interpret this an admission that the petition is well-taken and grant the petition, quashing the order of the trial court.

RBES, L.C. v. Santana, 770 So. 2d 277, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2000 WL 1634404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

770 So. 2d 277 (RBES, L.C. v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related