RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Highland Capital Management, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 27, 2013·No. 05-13-00948-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 27, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00948-CV

RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02034-D

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 15, 2013 unopposed motion to clarify the

reporter’s record. The court reporter filed a 22-volume reporter’s record on September 26, 2013.

On October 22, 2013, the court reporter filed corrected versions of volumes 11 through 17 and

filed further corrected versions of volumes 13, 14, 16, and 17 on October 25, 2013. The court

reporter labeled the corrected versions of the reporter’s records as supplemental reporter’s

records.

We GRANT appellant’s motion to the following extent: we STRIKE volumes 11

through 17 of the reporter’s record filed on September 26, 2013 and volumes 13, 14, 16, and 17

of the supplemental reporter’s record filed on October 22, 2013. Thus, the reporter’s record

properly before the Court consists of volumes 1 through 10 and volumes 18 through 22 filed on September 26, 2013, volumes 11, 12, and 15 filed on October 22, 2013, and volumes 13, 14, 16,

and 17 filed on October 25, 2013. Although volumes 11 through 17 are labeled as supplemental

reporter’s records the parties shall refer to them without the “supplemental” designation.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Highland Capital Management, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Highland Capital Management, L.P. (RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Highland Capital Management, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.