RB v. Department of Children and Families

799 So. 2d 441, 2001 WL 1436106
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 2001
Docket5D01-181
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 799 So. 2d 441 (RB v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RB v. Department of Children and Families, 799 So. 2d 441, 2001 WL 1436106 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

799 So.2d 441 (2001)

R.B., Father of J.B., A Child, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 5D01-181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 16, 2001.

*442 Ryan Thomas Truskoski of RyanThomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

James A. Sawyer, Jr., Kissimmee, for Appellee.

PALMER, J.

R.B. (father) appeals the order of the trial court adjudicating his daughter to be dependent and placing her in shelter care. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

The father contends that the trial court erred in finding dependency on the basis of abandonment, when the petition for dependency did not reference abandonment. The father's position is unfounded because the petition for dependency alleged generally that the parents had abused and neglected the child, and the trial court stated on the record that the child was found dependent based upon the father's neglect.

The father also argues that this court erred when it dismissed his first appeal based upon a determination that the trial court's order finding his daughter dependent but withholding an adjudication of dependency was not a final, appealable order. Although both parties recognize that this issue is now moot, both request appellate review because of an apparent inconsistency in the manner in which our court has addressed this issue. See Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Jones, 789 So.2d 964 (Fla.2001) (holding that the court can properly address an issue which, although moot, is likely to recur). We agree that appellate review is warranted and take this opportunity to reiterate that a trial court order finding a child dependent but withholding an adjudication of dependency is properly reviewable by this court pursuant to rule 9.030(b)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See F.R. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 763 So.2d 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); K.S. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 760 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. L.-B., Mother of I.L., C.D., H.L., B.B. v. Department of Children and Families
175 So. 3d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
N.E.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services
11 So. 3d 1013 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
PH v. Department of Children and Families
901 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
799 So. 2d 441, 2001 WL 1436106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rb-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2001.