Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk
This text of 547 F. App'x 220 (Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin Razzoli, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Razzoli v. Middle Dist. Court Clerk, No. 2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. May 28 & June 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/razzoli-v-middle-district-court-clerk-ca4-2013.