Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk

Fourth Circuit

Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk

547 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2013·No. No. 13-6988·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Razzoli, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Razzoli v. Middle Dist. Court Clerk, No. 2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. May 28 & June 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Razzoli, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Razzoli v. Middle Dist. Court Clerk, No. 2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. May 28 & June 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk, 547 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 220 (Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related