Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Razz v. State

Razz v. State

237 So. 3d 462
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2018·No. No. 4D16–2400·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing and amended motion for rehearing, but withdraw our previously issued per curiam decision and substitute the following in its place.

Affirmed. Taylor v. State , 114 So.3d 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ; contra *463Lewars v. State , 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1098, --- So.3d ---- (Fla. 2d DCA May 12, 2017), review granted , No. SC17-1002, 2017 WL 4022360 (Fla. Sept. 13, 2017).

Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Razz v. State, 237 So. 3d 462 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

237 So. 3d 462 (Razz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
114 So. 3d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)