Razillard, B., Pet v. Norfolk Southern
This text of Razillard, B., Pet v. Norfolk Southern (Razillard, B., Pet v. Norfolk Southern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
BRUCE R. RAZILLARD, : No. 354 WAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : NORFOLK SOUTHERN, NORFOLK : SOUTHERN CORPORATION, NORFOLK : SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, : : Respondents :
BRUCE R. RAZILLARD, : No. 370 WAL 2015 : Respondent : : Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : NORFOLK SOUTHERN, NORFOLK : SOUTHERN CORPORATION, NORFOLK : SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Razillard, B., Pet v. Norfolk Southern, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/razillard-b-pet-v-norfolk-southern-pa-2016.