Razall v. Razall

14 N.W.2d 764, 245 Wis. 416, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 349
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1944·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

While Mr. Justice Fritz was still on the circuit court, issues in the divorce action were before him. Therefore, he is not sitting in the consideration of this appeal.

The remaining members of the court are equally divided. Mr. Justice Wickhem, Mr. Justice Martin, and the writer are of the opinion that the order should be reversed. Mr. *427 Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fowler, and Mr. Justice Barlow are of the opinion that the order should be affirmed.

Under the rule, the order appealed from is affirmed.

-By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Razall v. Razall, 14 N.W.2d 764, 245 Wis. 416, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 349 (Wis. 1944).

14 N.W.2d 764 (Razall v. Razall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Van Dyke v. First National Bank
46 N.W.2d 667 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
In Re Trust Created by Moulton
233 Minn. 286 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)