Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

E.D. Oklahoma

Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

DecidedDecember 2, 2025

Docket6:25-cv-00250

StatusUnknown

This text of Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, (E.D. Okla. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

RAYVIN SALINE ROSE ) WOOLSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CIV-25-250-GLJ v. ) ) FRANK J. BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Claimant, Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey, was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Claimant seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $771.00 for 3.00 hours of attorney work. Docket No. 14, Ex. 1. The Commissioner did not file a response opposing this request, and the time do so has lapsed. See Docket No. 15. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the requested amount is reasonable, and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to Claimant as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 14] is hereby GRANTED. The Government is hereby ordered to pay the aforementioned fee award to Claimant as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Claimant’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Claimant pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d

575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 2nd day of December 2025.

GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

RAYVIN SALINE ROSE ) WOOLSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CIV-25-250-GLJ v. ) ) FRANK J. BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Claimant, Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey, was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Claimant seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $771.00 for 3.00 hours of attorney work. Docket No. 14, Ex. 1. The Commissioner did not file a response opposing this request, and the time do so has lapsed. See Docket No. 15. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the requested amount is reasonable, and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to Claimant as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 14] is hereby GRANTED. The Government is hereby ordered to pay the aforementioned fee award to Claimant as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Claimant’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Claimant pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d

575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 2nd day of December 2025.

GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rayvin Saline Rose Woolsey v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rayvin-saline-rose-woolsey-v-frank-j-bisignano-commissioner-of-the-oked-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack