Raytaurus Armstrong v. State of Florida
This text of Raytaurus Armstrong v. State of Florida (Raytaurus Armstrong v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-0957 L.T. Case No. 2013-CF-338-A _____________________________
RAYTAURUS ARMSTRONG,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, London M. Kite, Judge.
Raytaurus Armstrong, Madison, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
October 4, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Appellant sought relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant appealed the trial court’s summary dismissal of his 3.800 motion as successive. We reverse and remand with instructions for the postconviction court to either attach to its order Appellant’s three prior motions and their accompanying orders pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)(2), or to review and address the merits of the motion. Our reversal should not be construed or interpreted by the postconviction court as indicating that we have determined, on the merits, that Armstrong is entitled to relief on his motion. See Jones v. State, 198 So. 3d 920, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
EDWARDS, C.J., and KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raytaurus Armstrong v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raytaurus-armstrong-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.