Raysor v. Berkeley County Railway & Lumber Co.

2 S.E. 119, 26 S.C. 610, 1887 S.C. LEXIS 61
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 19, 1887·No. No. 2020·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

Plaintiff was employed by defendant at a salary of $100 a month. Prior to January, 1886, he demanded of the superintendent an increase of $25 a month, after January, or he would leave. The superintendent promised an answer in a few days, but did not answer for several months, when he informed plaintiff that his salary had been increased to $125 a month from May 1. This was an action to recover $75 — from February 1 to May 1 — the balance of salary having been paid. The claim was sustained by the trial justice, and by Judge Witherspoon on appeal to the Circuit Court. This court reversed the judgment below, holding that there was no assent by defendant to the increase of salary sued for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raysor v. Berkeley County Railway & Lumber Co., 2 S.E. 119, 26 S.C. 610, 1887 S.C. LEXIS 61 (S.C. 1887).

2 S.E. 119 (Raysor v. Berkeley County Railway & Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florence City-County Airport Commission v. Air Terminal Parking Co.
322 S.E.2d 471 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Bowley v. Fuller
115 A. 466 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1921)
Colleton Realty Co. v. Folk
67 S.E. 156 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1910)
Metzler v. Harry Kaufman Co.
32 App. D.C. 434 (D.C. Circuit, 1909)