Raynsford v. Phelps

13 N.W. 606, 49 Mich. 315, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 559
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.W. 606 (Raynsford v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raynsford v. Phelps, 13 N.W. 606, 49 Mich. 315, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 559 (Mich. 1882).

Opinion

Campbell, J.

Raynsford sued Phelps for alleged damages from a false return. 13 Mich. 312. Raynsford held a mortgage on certain lands in Kent county, and claims that Phelps as tax collector returned certain taxes unpaid, when in fact he could have collected them out of personalty. He insists, therefore, that to that extent his security was impaired, and clouded, by the tax sale under the return.

On the trial it appeared that the tax was void, and no dispute seems to exist on this. The defects were such as have been frequently passed upon. But plaintiff still insists that there was wrong done by the false return, and that the defendant is estopped by it. A sufficient answer to this is that plaintiff can only sue for a wrong from which he has suffered injury, and that a void-tax creates no such injury. ¡

Judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Husan v. Kanouse
13 Mich. 303 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.W. 606, 49 Mich. 315, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynsford-v-phelps-mich-1882.