Raynsford v. Phelps
This text of 13 N.W. 606 (Raynsford v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raynsford sued Phelps for alleged damages from a false return. 13 Mich. 312. Raynsford held a mortgage on certain lands in Kent county, and claims that Phelps as tax collector returned certain taxes unpaid, when in fact he could have collected them out of personalty. He insists, therefore, that to that extent his security was impaired, and clouded, by the tax sale under the return.
On the trial it appeared that the tax was void, and no dispute seems to exist on this. The defects were such as have been frequently passed upon. But plaintiff still insists that there was wrong done by the false return, and that the defendant is estopped by it. A sufficient answer to this is that plaintiff can only sue for a wrong from which he has suffered injury, and that a void-tax creates no such injury. ¡
Judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 N.W. 606, 49 Mich. 315, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynsford-v-phelps-mich-1882.