Raynor v. Steinfield
This text of 261 A.D. 929 (Raynor v. Steinfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered June 18, 1932, in Suffolk county, and a transcript thereof filed July 25, 1940, in Nassau county, on the ground that personal service of process was never had. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term to determine on oral proof whether defendant was, in fact, served. Whether or not defendant was served cannot be determined except on an oral hearing, in view of the conflict in the affidavits of affiants Stein-field, Sternfels and Walker. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 929, 26 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynor-v-steinfield-nyappdiv-1941.