Raynor v. . Mills
This text of 162 S.E. 923 (Raynor v. . Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful death.
Plaintiff's intestate, Tom Raynor, foreman in defendant's mill, was killed by one Cad Harrell, an employee working under the deceased, while the two were on duty in the employ of the defendant.
The case was tried once before and nonsuited. On the present hearing, two defenses were interposed, first res judicata, and, second, nonliability under the plaintiff's showing.
From a judgment of nonsuit the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the judgment of nonsuit is correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 S.E. 923, 202 N.C. 834, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynor-v-mills-nc-1932.