Raynor v. Dorothy Dix Hospital
This text of Raynor v. Dorothy Dix Hospital (Raynor v. Dorothy Dix Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Order based upon plaintiff's claim for damages pursuant to G.S.
***********
The order dismissing plaintiff's claim should be upheld. The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as law that plaintiff failed to allege negligence on the part of an employee or agent of any state agency pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.
Therefore, in view of the foregoing, plaintiff's claim is hereby Dismissed as a matter of law on the grounds that plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. It is therefore unnecessary to address the issues of plaintiff's compliance with the requirements of Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure or of plaintiff's apparent failure to file a claim within the applicable statutory period.
Each side shall bear its own costs.
S/_____________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ RENEE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER
DCS/nwg
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raynor v. Dorothy Dix Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raynor-v-dorothy-dix-hospital-ncworkcompcom-1999.