Raynier v. 159 Eluji Associates, LLC
92 A.D.3d 617, 938 N.Y.2d 803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 2012·Published
Opinion
The motion court correctly determined that neither Real Property Law § 234 nor the plain terms of the lease provided for recovery of attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of an administrative application before the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (see e.g. Matter of Chessin v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 100 AD2d 297, 305-306 [1984]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raynier v. 159 Eluji Associates, LLC, 92 A.D.3d 617, 938 N.Y.2d 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
92 A.D.3d 617 (Raynier v. 159 Eluji Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chessin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
100 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)