Raymundo Javier Ortiz v. the State of Texas
This text of Raymundo Javier Ortiz v. the State of Texas (Raymundo Javier Ortiz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00280-CR
RAYMUNDO JAVIER ORTIZ, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-2024A-010, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding
March 30, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Raymundo Javier Ortiz, appeals his conviction for murder 1 and
sentence to ninety-nine years of confinement. Appellant’s appointed counsel has moved
to withdraw from the appeal, asserting that potential issues may create a conflict of
interest between the Panhandle Area Public Defender’s office and Appellant.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 19.02. Because the trial court is responsible for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants in criminal cases, as well as relieving or replacing appointed counsel, we
abate the appeal, suspend all appellate deadlines, and remand the cause to the trial court
to rule on Appellant’s motion to withdraw. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d),
26.04(j)(2). Upon remand, the trial court shall determine (1) whether Appellant still
desires to prosecute the appeal; (2) whether to grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to
withdraw; and (3) if the motion to withdraw is granted, whether Appellant is indigent and
entitled to appointment of new counsel.
If the trial court grants the motion to withdraw and appoints Appellant new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and State Bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the court’s findings. The trial court may also enter
such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. The trial court’s
findings and any orders issued shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be
filed with this Court by April 29, 2026.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Raymundo Javier Ortiz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymundo-javier-ortiz-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.