Raymong H. Brunelle v. United States

185 F.2d 757
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 14, 1950·No. 10669·Published

Opinion

185 F.2d 757

88 U.S.App.D.C. 395

Raymong H. BRUNELLE, Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10669.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 27, 1950.
Decided Dec. 14, 1950.

Mr. Rutherford Day, Washington, D.C. (appointed by the District Court) for appellant.

Mr. Frederick G. Smithson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph M. Howard and Harold H. Bacon, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no prejudicial error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymong H. Brunelle v. United States, 185 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

185 F.2d 757 (Raymong H. Brunelle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brunelle v. United States
185 F.2d 757 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)