Raymong H. Brunelle v. United States
This text of 185 F.2d 757 (Raymong H. Brunelle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
88 U.S.App.D.C. 395
Raymong H. BRUNELLE, Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 10669.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Nov. 27, 1950.
Decided Dec. 14, 1950.
Mr. Rutherford Day, Washington, D.C. (appointed by the District Court) for appellant.
Mr. Frederick G. Smithson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and Joseph M. Howard and Harold H. Bacon, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no prejudicial error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.2d 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymong-h-brunelle-v-united-states-cadc-1950.