Raymond White v. T. M. Young
This text of 829 F.2d 1127 (Raymond White v. T. M. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Raymond WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
T. M. YOUNG, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-5211
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
September 22, 1987.
ORDER
Before ENGEL and RYAN, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Upon consideration, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its order granting summary judgment filed January 27, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
829 F.2d 1127, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12581, 1987 WL 44835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-white-v-t-m-young-ca6-1987.