Raymond v. State

627 So. 2d 128, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12280, 1993 WL 499241
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1993·No. No. 92-4015·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Raymond challenges his sentence imposed following the revocation of his probation. He argues that the court reversibly erred in sentencing him based on a new scoresheet rather than on the original score-sheet, and points to well-settled law providing that when sentencing a defendant for a violation of probation, the trial court is to use the original scoresheet. See Hopps v. State, 590 So.2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), cause dismissed, 595 So.2d 557 (Fla.1992); Pfeiffer v. State, 568 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Graham v. State, 559 So.2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The state concedes error. Based on the foregoing authority, we reverse and remand for resentencing, directing the trial court to utilize the original scoresheet.

REVERSED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raymond v. State, 627 So. 2d 128, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12280, 1993 WL 499241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 128 (Raymond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pfeiffer v. State
568 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Graham v. State
559 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Hopps v. State
590 So. 2d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)