Raymond v. Singer Manuf'g Co.

D. Massachusetts

Raymond v. Singer Manuf'g Co.

11 F. 427, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2414

DecidedApril 18, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. 427 (Raymond v. Singer Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond v. Singer Manuf'g Co., 11 F. 427, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2414 (D. Mass. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Lowell, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 101,140, granted to Lawyer & Gasten, March 22, 1870, for an improvement in sewing machines, and alleges an infringement by the defendants of the second claim of the patent, relating to a spring catch for keeping the shuttle in place.

After careful and repeated examinations of the evidence, I think the defendants have proved that this part of the invention was-anticipated by James Bolton, in 1867, as alleged in the amended answer.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lowell, C. J.

The plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 101,140, granted to Lawyer & Gasten, March 22, 1870, for an improvement in sewing machines, and alleges an infringement by the defendants of the second claim of the patent, relating to a spring catch for keeping the shuttle in place.

After careful and repeated examinations of the evidence, I think the defendants have proved that this part of the invention was-anticipated by James Bolton, in 1867, as alleged in the amended answer.

Bill dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. 427, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-v-singer-manufg-co-mad-1882.