Raymond v. Parish of Terrebonne

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Raymond v. Parish of Terrebonne

28 F. 773, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2359

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

DecidedJune 12, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 28 F. 773 (Raymond v. Parish of Terrebonne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raymond v. Parish of Terrebonne, 28 F. 773, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2359 (circtedla 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Biddings, J.

This ease was submitted upon an agreement that the facts were to be considered as the same as those stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Manning in Babnsse v. Parish of Terrebonne, SO La. Ann. 287. We are of opinion that the construction there given of the statute, authorizing the issue of the bonds in suit,—the additional fact having been found by us that the plaintiff took title after that decision was made public,—is binding upon this court; the question in that respect being one of local statute, and not of general commercial law. We are also of opinion that the construction is correct, provided the questions were new.

Judgment for defendant.-

Pabdee, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biddings, J.

This ease was submitted upon an agreement that the facts were to be considered as the same as those stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Manning in Babnsse v. Parish of Terrebonne, SO La. Ann. 287. We are of opinion that the construction there given of the statute, authorizing the issue of the bonds in suit,—the additional fact having been found by us that the plaintiff took title after that decision was made public,—is binding upon this court; the question in that respect being one of local statute, and not of general commercial law. We are also of opinion that the construction is correct, provided the questions were new.

Judgment for defendant.-

Pabdee, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 F. 773, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-v-parish-of-terrebonne-circtedla-1886.