Raymond v. Davy
167 Misc. 127, 3 N.Y.S.2d 661
This text of 167 Misc. 127 (Raymond v. Davy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raymond v. Davy, 167 Misc. 127, 3 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
While the form of the answer is unimportant on a motion for summary judgment, we think the affidavits justify the conclusion that the answer was sham.
Order and judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 Misc. 127, 3 N.Y.S.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-v-davy-nyappterm-1937.