Raymond v. Baker

103 N.E. 283, 216 Mass. 200, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1358
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 N.E. 283 (Raymond v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raymond v. Baker, 103 N.E. 283, 216 Mass. 200, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1358 (Mass. 1913).

Opinion

Hammond, J.

At the request of the defendant the judge ruled that unless the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant’s intestate “personally ordered the ejectment of the plaintiff from personal motives the plaintiff could not recover;” and the defendant insists that the evidence is insufficient to warrant a finding that the order was given from “personal motives.”

Upon a careful perusal of the evidence we are of opinion that this question was not one of law but one of fact for the trial judge, and we cannot say that he erred in law in finding for the plaintiff. There was no error in the manner in which he dealt with the requests for rulings.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooper v. Cuneo
227 Mass. 37 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 N.E. 283, 216 Mass. 200, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raymond-v-baker-mass-1913.